Current Events

OBAMACARE GOES TO COURT

Spread The Love

This week, President Obama’s signature health care bill, also known as “Obamacare,” is in front of the Supreme Court for review.  The nation’s highest court could rule to uphold parts or all of it or to dismiss parts or all of it.  But how will their ruling affect the 2012 presidential election?

IF THE SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS OBAMACARE – it would be a huge win for President Obama. He spent a great deal of political capital getting the bill passed and a Supreme Court ruling in his favor would be a powerful vindication.  Moreso, a positive ruling from the court would also remove the issue from the political debate in the fall.  Republicans have been itching to use ObamaCare against the president in the general election.  But if the court upholds the bill, Mr. Obama would no longer be the target.  The Supreme Court would then be the deciding factor, removing the bulls eye from the president and placing it squarely on the court — and no Republican would dare challenge the Supreme Court on their final ruling.  Although they would almost certainly try to repeal the law if they gained power in the fall.

IF THE SUPREME COURT DISMISSES OBAMACARE – it would be a blow to President Obama’s leadership, but not necessarily in the way you may think.  Mr. Obama is a constitutional lawyer and a negative ruling from the court would question his legal knowledge in introducing such a bill.  But the negative ruling would not necessarily be a bad thing for him in the fall election.  An up or down court ruling would still water down the issue in the general election debate, limiting Republicans from utilizing what they believe to be their “trump card.”

On a side note, should Mitt Romney become the Republican nominee, he would also be a winner should the court dismiss the president’s signature health care bill. ObamaCare was primarily designed to be almost exactly like RomneyCare, which is the health care bill Mitt Romney once promoted while he was governor of Massachusetts.  If the court strikes down ObamaCare, both President Obama and Mr. Romney could avoid having to discuss it in the fall, which could end up a win/win for both of their campaigns.

Conventional thinking says the Supreme Court doesn’t wish to touch this issue with a 10 foot pole. Interfering and overturning the law is something they’d much rather avoid and is not a huge part of the court’s history. So, many legal scholars believe they will take the position that since the law has already been passed. it will stay passed.  Or in other words, they will uphold ObamaCare in an attempt to remain detached from the issue.  Stay tuned…

0 0 votes
Article Rating

DJ

DJ is the creator and editor of OK WASSUP! He is also a Guest Writer/Blogger, Professional and Motivational Speaker, Producer, Music Consultant, and Media Contributor. New York, New York USA

Related Articles

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Truthiz

"Conventional thinking says the Supreme Court doesn't wish to touch this issue with a 10 foot pole."I think that's probably an understatement. But this issue IS now before the Supreme Court. The Justices must rule on it and make no mistake about it..the outcome WILL have a Significant impact on the Presidential race and more specifically, on the perception of Pres. Obama's presidency.The truth is, of ALL the President's notable achievements I've expressed my disappointment before with what I feel was an absolute FAILURE on the part of the President and his team to adequately SELL "Obamacare" (explain how it works and its benefits ) to the American people."Obamacare" was supposed to be his "Signature" achivement and yet the effort of the President AND his team to treat it as such was, IMO, half-azzed at best. Call it arrogance or being just plain LAZY. I think it was mix of both. Now the President is forced to sweat this thing out…smh. Regardless of the outcome (and I hope it's positive), the President and his team… Read more »

Truthiz

A few reax following yesterday's oral arguments……. CNN's Jeffery Toobin: "Today Was 'Train Wreck' for Health Reform Law"Today was a "train wreck" for the White House, said the network's legal analyst, according to Business Insider. "This law looks like it's going to be struck down. I'm telling you, all of the predictions including mine that the justices would not have a problem with this law were wrong."Goldstein @ SCOTUSblog: “Based on the questions posed to Paul Clement, the lead attorney for the state challengers to the individual mandate, it appears that the mandate is in trouble. It is not clear whether it will be struck down, but the questions that the conservative justices posed to Clement were not nearly as pressing as the ones they asked to Solicitor General Verrilli," he writes. "It will be close. Very close."Editor's Blog TPM: "A reminder that this sort of tea-leaf reading can be overdone… Read more »

Truthiz

<span>SCOTUSblog: "Argument recap: It is Kennedy’s call"   Analysis   If Justice Anthony M. Kennedy can locate a limiting principle in the federal government’s defense of the new individual health insurance mandate, or can think of one on his own, the mandate may well survive.  If he does, he may take Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., and a majority along with him.  But if he does not, the mandate is gone.  That is where Tuesday’s argument wound up — with Kennedy, after first displaying a very deep skepticism, leaving the impression that he might yet be the mandate’s savior.   If the vote had been taken after Solicitor General Donald B. Verrilli, Jr., stepped back from the lectern after the first 56 minutes, and the audience stood up for a mid-argument stretch, the chances were that the most significant feature of the Affordable Care Act would have perished in Kennedy’s concern that it just… Read more »

Truthiz

<span>David Frum calls OUT the GOP:   "Supremes Won't Save GOP From Itself on Obamacare"   All or nothing.   That has been the dominant Republican approach to Obamacare from the start, and it is the dominant Republican approach today.   In Congress, this approach led to the result: "Nothing."   Now conservative challengers are hoping the Supreme Court will step in. And who knows? Maybe the justices are feeling bold. Maybe they are ready to expose themselves again to the fiercest partisan criticism since Bush v. Gore, or even fiercer.    I'm not a Court-watcher, and have no expertise to offer, but just going with my gut: I doubt it. Even though the Solicitor General reportedly choked today, that doesn't change the fact that the conservatives on the Court have spent most of their intellectual lives railing against judicial activism.                                   ……………………………………………………   If you have said over and over again, in writing, that you object to… Read more »

Truthiz

So on this day of *FINAL* arguments, it seems that most media *band-wagon* talking-heads have settled on a narrative: "Oh woe is the president. Oh woe is Obamacare."Meanwhile I think 2 guys capable of thinking OUTSIDE the media echo chamber have PERHAPS more accurately summed up where things really stand: David Frum (see previous entry) and Lyle Denniston over at SCOTUSblog:Analysis: "Argument recap: A lift for the mandate?"The Supreme Court spent 91 minutes Wednesday operating on the assumption that it would strike down the key feature of the new health care law, but may have convinced itself in the end not to do that because of just how hard it would be to decide what to do after that.  A common reaction, across the bench, was that the Justices themselves did not want the onerous task of going through the remainder of the entire 2,700 pages of the law and deciding what to keep and what to throw out, and most seemed… Read more »

Check Also
Close
Back to top button
5
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x