Top News Today

Women’s March Goes Global Against Trump

Spread The Love
Women’s March 2017

Top News Today –
Women’s March
Goes Global
Against Trump


Although rain clouds darkened skies from coast to coast on Inauguration Day, rays of sunlight burst through by Saturday for a historic Women’s March against Donald Trump that took place in major cities across the US and around the world.

Top News Today
In what is being called the biggest one-day protest in US history, the Women’s March on Washington prompted millions of Americans to take to the streets from New York to Los Angeles and everywhere in between.

An estimated 500,000 people participated in the main Women’s March in Washington, DC, while the same numbers were seen in New York City. In Chicago, 250,000 people marched.  In Atlanta, it was 60,000 people. There are estimates of 250,000 people in Boston, and 200,000 more in Denver. In Los Angeles, organizers expected 80,000 participants, but 750,000 showed up. There were also estimates of 60,000 in Oakland, CA, 50,000 in Philadelphia, 100,000 in Madison, WI, 20,000 in Pittsburgh, 20,000 in Nashville, TN, and 60,000 in St. Paul, MN.

However, the protests didn’t end at the US border.

In London, 100,000 people marched and shouted “Dump Trump.” In Toronto, the estimate was nearly 60,000.  At least 10,000 took to the streets of Sydney, Australia. In fact, Saturday’s rallying cry was heard from Paris to Prague, Sydney to Johannesburg, and in some 20 cities across Canada.

Unlike Trump’s poorly attended Inauguration and pathetic parade, the numbers and the global participation of the Women’s March are unprecedented. In fact, there has never been a one-day protest this large in the history of the United States.

By comparison, the 1982 anti-nuclear march in New York City drew an estimated crowd of 1 million. The 1963 Civil Rights March on Washington drew 250,000. The 1969 anti-Vietnam war march in Washington was attended by an estimated 500,000-600,000, while 1995’s Million Man March was attended by 400,000-1.1 million. In 1993, the LGBT March for equal rights had a crowd of 800,00-1 million.

The Women’s March is positive proof that the American people and the world will not accept the racist, misogynistic, xenophobic agenda of Donald Trump without a serious fight. It was also a peaceful presentation of pink “pussyhats” that brought downtown Washington to a standstill and displayed a global sisterhood never before seen in modern times.

Donald Trump initially refused to acknowledge the mass protests that were a deliberate message for the man many fear is prepared to roll back the rights of women, immigrants, gays, and minorities. However, after his handlers likely held him out for a long as they could, the thin-skinned Trump eventually took to his Twitter account to blast the protesters, saying “Why didn’t these people vote?”

Still, Trump’s sourpuss mood could not dampen the spirit of the sisterhood.

Top News Today
“I’m part of history, and one day will tell my children about this,” said 16-year-old Maria Iman, who traveled to Washington with fellow high school students from Illinois. “It feels amazing.”

“He’s a narcissist and seeks approval, and this is a big display of disapproval,” Tanya Gaxiola, who flew in from Tucson, Arizona said. “Hopefully, it catches his attention.”

“We can whimper. We can whine. Or we can fight back!” Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren said with a loud roar in Boston.

Celebrities Scarlett Johansson and Michael Moore were among the speakers on the Washington protest stage, however, it was pop icon Madonna who delivered an expletive-laden indictment of “The Donald.”

“Welcome to the revolution of love,” the 58-year-old singer said while wearing her own black pussyhat. “To the rebellion. To our refusal as women to accept this new age of tyranny.”

The march participants weren’t exclusively female. Women, men, teens, pensioners, parents with toddlers on their shoulders all clogged the streets around the National Mall for hours before flowing towards the White House in a determined show of unity.

“Women won’t back down,” “Women’s rights are human rights” and “Thank you Trump — you turned me into an activist,” read several of the thousands of handmade signs seen during the demonstrations.

Interestingly, the Women’s March began with a simple Facebook post from Hawaii grandmother and retired lawyer Teresa Shook, who initially asked about 40 of her friends to “do something” once Trump took office.  However, word traveled quickly and the event eventually took on a global life of its own.

If Friday was Trump’s day, Saturday most certainly belonged to the Women’s March.

 

 

TAKE OUR POLL:


 

OK WASSUP! covers Top News Today:
Women’s March Goes Global

0 0 votes
Article Rating

DJ

DJ is the creator and editor of OK WASSUP! He is also a Guest Writer/Blogger, Professional and Motivational Speaker, Producer, Music Consultant, and Media Contributor. New York, New York USA

Related Articles

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
13 Comments
oldest
newest most voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Truthiz1

The truth is my praise for the Women's March (and it was quite the showing of *Female-and Male- Unity") is tempered by a few very pressing questions I have concerning the organizers and participants. Beginning with: Where, pray tell, was this kind of organized push-back against Trump and Trump's America BEFORE the election?! Also, in light of the fact that (1) the majority of marches were White women and (2) Trump reportedly won the White Women's vote – I"d sure like to know if the majority of women who marched actually voted? And of those who voted, which presidential candidate did the majority of female marchers vote for? The Women's March (nationally and globally) was impressive. But unless there a serious commitment to organized follow-up, showing sustained resistance to Trump and his mucked up vision for governing this country…well, then the March will likely be viewed as little more than… Read more »

Mr. BD

You ask a lot of good questions Truth. I don't know where these women where or if they didn't vote. Hillary did win the popular vote so maybe all these women did vote I don't know. But I won't try to second guess anything. The fact that women all over the world rose up against Trump is strong. It sends him a message he is the most disliked president in history. Maybe it will wake him and change him. We will see.

Truthiz1

I'd also like to add………..

Word to the organizers: You can't beat darkness with darkness. You beat darkness with Light.

1. When some of the heated rhetoric coming out of the mouths of some of your guest speakers is just as Vile and Vulgar as anything you might hear coming from Trump's mouth on any given day, at any given time, then your message is NO BETTER than his. And…

2. The decision to DIS-invite the *Right to-Life* Woman's group(s) who wanted to participate in the March was a missed opportunity to show inclusiveness. And just plain dumb.

Nancy

We are organizing to fight back daily for as long as it takes.

Truthiz1

NYTimes Reader:
Some on the left worry that we are seeing the rise of fascism, a new authoritarian age. That gets things exactly backward. The real fear in the Trump era should be that everything will become disorganized, chaotic, degenerate, clownish and incompetent. […]

NYTimes Reader:
Fascism is clownish and incompetent chaos under the facade of law and order authoritarianism. It leads to ruin, as German history has taught us. In just 10 years from cheering flag-waving crowds to bomb-flattened cities. [….]

TAC Reader:
Hopefully the marches will translate into votes. If people voted every election, especially at the local level,they could eliminate the need for marches and protests by ensuring republicans are kicked out of office. The only cuts republicans will make in the budget, will be cuts that hurt the poor. Stop whining and vote them out of office. [….]

Nancy

Anybody could have joined the march! No one was monitoring who was there. I saw religious signs. No one bothered the religious people.

Truthiz1

"Pro-life Group: We Were Never Given an Explanation Why We Were Dropped As Sponsor From Women's March" The New Wave Feminists found out from reporters that their name had been dropped from the list of sponsors at Saturday's Women's March. Its president, Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa, told "Fox and Friends" that the march organizers knew full well they were a pro-life group, yet once they saw the backlash their presence invoked, the organizers caved to pressure and dropped their partnership status. [….] H/T: Townhall "Pro-Life Feminist Calls Out 'Specific Type of Diversity' for Exclusion from March" The founder and president of a pro-life feminist group joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss how her group was uninvited to Saturday's Women's March on Washington. Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa said her group, New Wave Feminists, was originally listed as a partner for the event but organizers uninvited the group after backlash spread about… Read more »

Truthiz1

"Women's March Erects a Pro-Life Barrier" Excerpt: As a young woman living in Washington, D.C., I could easily attend the Women’s March on Saturday if I wanted to. Except that I {was} not invited, despite my unambiguous status as a member of the female sex. That’s because I am pro-life. As the organizers of the march made clear in a statement earlier {last} week, the Women’s March’s on Washington “platform is pro-choice” and “has been since day one.” “We look forward to marching on behalf of individuals who share th[at] view,” they went on, and stated that the since-revoked partnership of New Wave Feminists, a secular group with pro-life values, was an “error.” The march might as well have placed scare quotes around the word “Women’s,” or better yet, have renamed itself “The March for Abortion.” Then it would have cleared up any confusion about pretending to represent all women,… Read more »

Linda

Truthiz1 you seem very negative. All of your responses seem geared toward making a jumbled point. No one really knows or can know if the millions of women who marched over the weekend did or did not vote. Nor will anyone be able to clearly explain how certain women were left out of the march while millions of women all over the world who have no dog in the fight of pro-choice/pro-life eagerly participated. The stronger issue here is that women did not remain silent. They did not cower and allow this tyrant to take office and dismantle our rights one by one. Women everywhere came together as a powerful voice to stand up and be recognized. It's unfortunate you refuse to celebrate that.

Pippa

Totally agree

Mr. BD

This was a powerful movement. Congratulations to all the women and everybody who showed up. I just hope it makes a difference.

Truthiz1

My apologies to readers if I wasn't quite clear about the main question I've been pondering.

I will say (again)- the Women's March both nationally and globally was quite impressive.

However, where, pray tell, was this kind of organized push-back against Trump and Trump's America BEFORE the election?!

Truthiz1

…. …on a related note…… "Where Were All The Women's March Protesters in November?" Excerpts: It was huge. It was emotional. But it’s hard not to wonder what all these people were doing during the election, and what they will do after the protest has ended. The crowd, aware of its own size, emits giddy screams that ripple and grow. Its awareness is evocative of a baby opening and closing its fists, suddenly cognizant of its power to move its own extremities. Where was this during the campaign? Why is this happening now, arguably too late for real change? Is “making a statement” the same as making a change? Was Hillary Clinton really that uninspiring? Did all these people vote? Trying to work one’s way through tens of thousands of people and to a gap hole in a chain link fence is a much bigger pain in the ass than… Read more »

Back to top button
13
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x